RENAISSANCE PHYSICS
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS NEED LOVE TOO
Change is a perpetual constant. The first renaissance in our history led humanity from cacophonies of unchecked conjecture to symphonies of the scientific method. Can any change ever be deemed better in every way with absolute certainty? Did Einstein know he was committing his "greatest blunder" by adding a cosmological constant to his original equation? Can our growth as an intelligent civilization be quantified satisfactorily if we are not even a type-1 civilization by our own metrics? Can we afford to impose increasingly rigid limitations on the process of theorizing without robbing future researchers of an unexpected direction to look in?
No
Speculation is not a slur
Ever scrapped a hypothesis that you knew could have been proven on a long enough time scale?
did you choose an easier hypothesis for your dissertation just to end the horror?
Simply. No. Broaden the definition of viable
We provide publishing for theoretical physicists who engage in novel yet difficult to research topics. Humanity's understanding of the universe is infinitesimal at best, so our goal is to help innovative physicists put forth concepts that they truly believe would become likely topics of research in the future. Why should a perfectly reasoned idea be kept in the shadows simply due to insufficient testing in a particular field caused by humanity's present technological limitations?
Brainstorm With Us
